[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Javascript security question

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Javascript security question
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:37:03 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:37:06 -0400
In-reply-to: <236316.99637.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <236316.99637.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:25:15AM +0000, Sadece Gercekler wrote:
> I know that enabling javascript is insecure. But my question is specific to gmail, google reader, yahoo mail, and blogger.com. These are the sites I'm mainly accessing.
> 
> Do you think enabling javascript for these sites can be OK?

Who knows? Have you considered the ads, or that you might get a custom
version when detected you're coming from a Tor exit?

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Javascript security question
  - From: James Brown

References:
- Javascript security question
  - From: Sadece Gercekler

Prev by Author: Re: Supercookies
Next by Author: Re: Javascript security question
Previous by thread: Javascript security question
Next by thread: Re: Javascript security question
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread