[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Annoying loop situation

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Annoying loop situation
From: Gitano <ran6oony7r9deku5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:31:36 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:31:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <200908221752.56017.security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Private
References: <200908211552.56566.security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200908220846.57979.security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A8FF9B3.3050504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200908221752.56017.security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)

Bob Williams wrote:

>> To use privoxy without Tor you can add the following line BELOW the
>> 'forward-socks*' lines:
>>
>> forward    /    .
>>
>> Last match wins, see also:
>> http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/config.html#FORWARDING
> 
> The effect of this would be the same as NOT having the forward-socks* lines, 
> wouldn't it? i.e. leaving forwarding unset?

Yes, but this additional line leaves the remaining settings of
Privoxy/TorButton unchanged. I don't know the behavior of TorButton
without the 'forward-socks*' lines in privoxy.conf.

References:
- Annoying loop situation
  - From: Bob Williams
- Re: Annoying loop situation
  - From: Bob Williams
- Re: Annoying loop situation
  - From: Gitano
- Re: Annoying loop situation
  - From: Bob Williams

Prev by Author: Re: Annoying loop situation
Next by Author: Archive crypto sigs [was: copy abuse]
Previous by thread: Re: Annoying loop situation
Next by thread: Re: Annoying loop situation
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread