[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses
From: Seth David Schoen <schoen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 20:54:14 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:54:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <20100802010706.GP550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20100730193243.GA8449@sescenties> <20100802010706.GP550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Steven J. Murdoch writes:

> Yes, this has been a known risk with all currently deployed
> low-latency anonymity systems. One recent paper which looked at the
> problem was discussed here:

Thanks for these references.

-- 
Seth Schoen
Senior Staff Technologist                         schoen@xxxxxxx
Electronic Frontier Foundation                    https://www.eff.org/
454 Shotwell Street, San Francisco, CA  94110     +1 415 436 9333 x107
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

References:
- Re: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses
  - From: Steven J. Murdoch

Prev by Author: Re: Tor Project 2008 Tax Return Now Online
Next by Author: TLS NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation)
Previous by thread: Re: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses
Next by thread: Padding again Was: Practical web-site-specific traffic analyses
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread