[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: https proxy [was polipo]

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: https proxy [was polipo]
From: morphium <morphium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:58:13 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:58:40 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=3jSY/U+CMiVPCn1eFM67G8uruK3+YqW2AIWKWdA9h6Y=; b=n7c0xtw21pTo5L2C2KJYkzR0AHpDgIkGxYM5pbeIdWirYDFUgaPl07LofAjDeiZlb2 T/b/ac83IsOciRFRcBFm3XoWCpnpWY+W4xk+4xEYp6V2Kjf3fggnI7WFEjIDpQo3FXuR lf39L4k01IaG0uGLZC3jwhreJDxGKyhJz7NRA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=YrrxjofSn0vexQ1b+DN4IBntIg97/d6n9hF/kAz0b46LjO2dSJf9LKSubdXd2p42ho hi9Nt5MFfANMvn6LRiG4itSqhvIF2Vu1chGoI0ivWLbemZ0UGx7eHo0NBzCYGeXcGjsJ Txync9wycAYvN/K1Qj709amuUmlYm6QKuUgRg=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTineqyTCda70XjyZLF=a7o=ZOT7JmCFK0FAY_tBe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AANLkTikPQeJEAfp8r0gro4F=SLq-=9ZROMZsiBVjm6Sg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTineqyTCda70XjyZLF=a7o=ZOT7JmCFK0FAY_tBe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

> I can see it could provide some
> protection against ssl/ssh mitm attacks.

No. Why do you think it could?

> It could better protect the
> "browser" (or other app) by moving some of the ssl/tls/cert logic out to an
> open source proxy of sorts.

Protect? Of what? How?

> It could better protect users against
> ssl/tls/cert vulnerabilities in both open source and proprietary apps.

Explain, please

Best regards, morphium
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: https proxy [was polipo]
  - From: coderman

References:
- Re: https proxy [was polipo]
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: https proxy [was polipo]
  - From: Julie C

Prev by Author: Re: DuckDuckGo now operates a Tor exit enclave
Next by Author: Re: Vulnerability in OpenSSL 1.0.x & Firefox 4 Silent Updates
Previous by thread: Re: https proxy [was polipo]
Next by thread: Re: https proxy [was polipo]
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread