[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Tor as ecommerce platform



Thus spake Maxim Kammerer (mk@xxxxxx):

> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Andrew Lewman <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > How would you have us promote Tor?
> 
> The âTor usersâ page isn't presented as a promotional page, it is
> presented as a factual one. I also remember discussion on this list
> where I expressed doubt about some aspects listed there (military
> uses), and the overall claim was that the page is a good
> representation of the current userbase.

Tor is a relatively new and underdeveloped technology, used exclusively
by early adopters, technophiles, weirdos, and people who really really
need it. We don't advertise. We're not in stores. This is because we're
pretty much still in the prototype stage.

As with most new and underdeveloped technologies, we're going to have
our demographics dominated by those early adopters and weirdos rather
than our target demographics.

For example, in terms of number of users, I'd wager a top current
demographic is "Paranoid Schizophrenic". If it's not #1, it's gotta be
top 5. The more general category "Antisocial tendencies" is probably
another top 5. "People who secretly view fully legal porn" is almost
certainly up there, perhaps vying with the schizophrenics for the #1
position.

The early Internet (even as late as the mid-90s) was also dominated by
these same classes of people. Eventually it became usable by the
normals and the demographics shifted quite dramatically.

We all work on Tor every day so that it sucks a little less each day, so
that those demographics *can* shift. However, right now, it's only the
extremes and certain niche elements of society who will suffer through
using it: Dissidents, journalists, law enforcement, militaries, and the
antisocial weirdos/crazies.

The Tor users page is in my mind a reflection of what our demographics
will look like as we improve our technology enough to be useful for
everyone who wants Internet privacy. We leave out the antisocial
creeps/weirdos/crazies because they are not our target userbase, and
their relative dominance right now is merely a reflection of our
relatively early development status.

No offense to the weirdos, though. You guys are my people :).

> > We have a FAQ (as you pointed out) to answer the obvious questions
> > about criminal usage of Tor. We're fully aware criminals can and do use
> > Tor.
> 
> So why not answer those questions honestly, and not pretend that users
> are stupid? As I said, it detracts from the project's credibility.
> Anyone who installs Tor (or I2P, for that matter) and explores the
> hidden services, immediately sees the overwhelmingly illegal (mostly,
> since it depends on jurisdiction) content. Anyone who runs an exit
> node immediately sees that a sizable portion of the traffic is of
> questionable nature. [1]

Even today, this statement is not accurate wrt exit traffic. The handful
of papers you and others have linked show that even with our current
userbase, illegal and questionable traffic takes up a small percentage
of the Tor exit traffic, unless you count all forms of pornography as
questionable.

In fact, the paper you linked even has an "Illegal/Questionable"
category, and guess what, it's #42 at 0.15% of the traffic:
http://planete.inrialpes.fr/papers/TorTraffic-NSS10.pdf

I don't know what you're looking for, but perhaps your own desire for
everyone to use Tor for "illegal and questionable" stuff is biasing what
*you* find?


-- 
Mike Perry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk