On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 22:21 +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:26 PM, With Weather Eye Open > <wweo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It is, in fact, difficult to do just by the nature of how Tor > functions. Even if you were logging everything that came out of an > exit node that you control, you wouldn't be able to get good stats > from that. You'd need a significant sampling of other Tor exit nodes > to do the same thing. > > That's not true, but it shows that you lack the probabilistic > background required to reason about such things. Well, you're assuming that an exit node (with some given exit policy) sees a fair sampling of all Tor exit traffic. This is not the case. Look into how Tor assigns exit nodes. > > It's a bit hard to accept that you don't have an agenda to protect > when you come in here asserting one of the most demonizing talking > points against Tor with nothing hard to back up your claims other than > "some guy on reddit said so." > > Fine, don't accept it, but if you can't understand what's discussed > (as I said, Reddit post was just an illustrative example), and have > nothing to contribute, just move on. I don't understand this need to > inject an opinion just because you don't like the conclusions. Find > something non-trivial to add to the discussion first. The non-trivial thing being added to the discussion is that your conclusions are based on flawed evidence. This is not an opinion, it's a statement of fact from my perspective, and apparently from others. -- Sent from Ubuntu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk