[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] End-to-end correlation for fun and profit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/21/2012 02:57 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> No, it means that if you intercept traffic from 10 top-bandwidth
> Tor routers with some characteristics (Guard + Exit, basically) at
> what's probably the nearest hardware switch (seems true for the
> nodes listed in my original message), then the probability of both
> entry and exit nodes being one of these routers is close to 11.5%.
> I just multiplied bandwidth-weighted probabilities for entry and
> exit nodes. The routers don't have to be on the same network.
> Enforcing different-family circuit nodes skews the probabilities,
> but not by much, so I didn't bother to account for that.
A valid point, I will concede.
Exactly how strongly weighted by bandwidth is node selection these days?
- --
The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS]
PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/
"The system of teaching is the teaching of the system." --Guy Debord
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlAz4oYACgkQO9j/K4B7F8EXTACeJjVhxOK8FnnyK9+ez5ZMOGd1
QRgAn1WtdoBnCqPY/Qo+BIA5D8LUQzP6
=Z+Vk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk