Re: [tor-talk] Updated "Why JavaScript is enabled" FAQ entry

["Michael J.J. Tiffany" <michael.tiffany@xxxxxxxxx>]

Issuing this hypothetical warning/status alert on
check.torproject.orgwould certainly have the highest positive user
impact.


On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Low-Key <cryptic303@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jon Tullett <jon.tullett@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > Personally I'd still like to see a message front and centre on the
> browser
> > homepage too...
>
> This isn't a bad idea.  Or, more specifically, why not use the existing
> javascript/no javascript routines in HTML on check.torproject.org to warn
> users of possible security ramifications from having javascript enabled?
> That might be the easiest method to continue packaging the Tor Browser
> Bundle as currently done without dealing with any negative feedback
> claiming that people are uninformed of the risks possible through
> javascript exploits and, thus, are left insecure by default.
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk