Re: [tor-talk] google

[Nathan Suchy <theusernameiwantistaken@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree. Even if Tor was illegal then just set it up and make a new gmail
and use it for tor-talk with a fake identity. Many of us use Tor for our
safety.
On Aug 21, 2013 7:13 AM, "mick" <mbm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:35:39 -0400
> William Conlow <wmconlow@xxxxxxxxx> allegedly wrote:
>
> > I'm a bit of a newb at this (all of it). But this email thread
> > (tor-talk) is completely unencrypted, right? And it has to be that
> > way?
> >
> It doesn't /have/ to be that way, but it is much more convenient (and
> useful to a much larger population) if it is structured that way.
> Arguably tor-talk (and/or other tor related lists) could be hosted on a
> hidden service, encrypyted (by a key trusted by a large group - which in
> itself is non-trivial to manage). But why? Usage of tor is not in
> itself illegal in the US (or in many other jurisdictions). Tor's
> designers and the relay operators (I am one) all want to see tor
> widely used so why hide discussion about it? Having a publicly readable
> archive of such discussion allows anyone interested in tor to follow
> earlier discussions and make up their own minds about whether they
> would wish to use tor. Hiding discussion would deny interested parties
> that right and would end up in futile "choir preaching".
>
> Best
>
> Mick
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  Mick Morgan
>  gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B  72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312
>  http://baldric.net
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk