[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-talk] IBM says Block Tor
I couldn't find what they mean with "the Netherlands is home to the
largest number of non-malicious and malicious nodes combined" in
Figure 1 on page 8. What differentiate a "malicious node" from a
"non-malicious node"?
Otherwise it wasn't that bad, but the last paragraph is quite offensive:
"In general, networks should be configured to deny access to websites
such as www.torproject.org"
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:51 AM, grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/wg/en/wgl03086usen/WGL03086USEN.PDF
>
> IBM Advises Businesses To Block Tor
>
> With Tor-based attacks on the rise, IBM says it's time to stop Tor in
> the enterprise.
>
> New data from IBM's X-Force research team shows steady increase in SQL
> injection and distributed denial-of-service attacks as well as
> vulnerability reconnaissance activity via the Tor anonymizing service.
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk