[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Way off topic talk about email
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Way off topic talk about email
- From: Anthony DiPierro <or@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:56:01 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:56:05 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=kTc3wBZIxgrmzlRVCOadsDx7WDyWCj2YZTxG5/c0iD+Hc2F4aW3ZYjzR5L4xQmfOUqKMsr44lA9MSMax/oPoA0JynYaDcI1f/DiLS1smADcPb7pgZydmDHr++5gefT4sb4GiO1apAMgraWbpEaplmytWui0lOVOUurSgB4K4BkM=
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 12/31/05, Eugen Leitl <eugen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I know, it's a pain in the ass to do all this just to get subscribed
> > to a mailing list. Personally, I hate email - I think it's a horribly
> > designed technology that unfortunately a lot of people insist on using
>
> If it hurts, you're doing it wrong. Email is self-archiving and
> self-admining (Mailman), creates multiple redundant realtime-searchable
> archives at each user's end (mailboxes) uses your favore editor and MUA,
> supports encryption, authentication, anti-spam filtering, and
> is sufficiently quick yet not realtime for in-depth discussions
> (you won't find this on IM/IRC) -- and half a dozen other things
> I haven't mentioned.
>
> If you compare this to any other medium, you'll notice none of them
> have all of those features. There are media complementary to email --
> nobody will prevent you from using them.
>
If it hurts, I'm doing it wrong? Maybe you can point me to a perfect
spam filter, because I haven't yet found one.
Your list of "features" essentially defined email, as one was that it
"creates multiple redundant realtime-searchable archives at each
user's end (mailboxes)". If you eliminate that "feature" there are
plenty of alternatives, and I don't really see it as a useful feature,
more of a horribly inefficient implementation. Some of the other
features I'm not even sure I agree about. Email supports
authentication and encryption? Only in the sense that you can easily
build authentication and encryption on top of any digital distribution
mechanism.
If I had the opportunity to post replies to this mailing list using a
web form instead of email I'd definitely use it. Creating a gmail
account to subscribe to mailing lists is the next best thing.
I guess it's true that no one is *forcing* me to use email. But
without an email address I can't access my bank's online banking, or
pay my student loans through the web, or post to or-talk, or subscribe
to slashdot, or receive paypal payments, or a whole host of other
things. That doesn't really make sense to me. In fact, using the
From: field of an email for authentication (which is what the or-talk
listserver does) makes about as much sense as using an IP address.
Anthony