[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Political/Legal] Passing ideas on German Tor nodes
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Political/Legal] Passing ideas on German Tor nodes
- From: "Alexander W. Janssen" <alexander.janssen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:47:18 +0100
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:47:33 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HAj58zywnilXS78u4IUU8hSuxM/dbi9t7gD0lXyIvyM=; b=fMIuUwU2/S/4I7BIlRR7soFcx8ftG/o8NwdDHPA1CPxBExe/g+q9gavsI/r2qKsNZ6wAhOe4MJe4g55/ujjv8obLF5vn1x4qlIYqJQaSdX9HaekZxh1leZcZXImiQU2qTa7+thcZLKTc6G76Njy2BSooKeUBwo7jtpTPK0ll6Bg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ebm8sIinkmj+oVKSMWVk16bGPKNXrL2NY7GUHxtdC9pn+CXm57LK/YR4UoT8uHE4eyEDtGnS5TK+t8X29pyQsGcuaC+776Z4HI334e+tDMYFvltT6QkLkt2BcO71e6Q9vNwMibLnbMJB14tnhuThI89E9A6R0cUhQerXC0hCimk=
- In-reply-to: <4753262D.6000900@xxxxxxxxx>
- Openpgp: id=90DEE171
- References: <4753262D.6000900@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
F. Fox wrote:
> However, let's suppose that we're in a time when German Tor nodes are
> now actively keeping logs of all connections. What would be the best way to:
As I already said in an earlier posting, German Tor nodes won't be
starting logging before 1/1/2009 - if they'll log at all - there's still
a pending lawsuit against the data retention law in the supreme court.
And I bet that there will be a lot civil disobedience when it comes to
logging.
> [... idea ...]
> So, what if a maximum of one German Tor node were allowed in a circuit?
> Would that achieve both numbered goals?
If that's the idea, than it should only be the middleman node.
Entry-node might be possible too, but only if you make sure that this
node is the only German node in the circuit.
> Given the logging, it might be wise to not allow the German node to be
> the exit node; I'm not sure about the entry guard.
Considering the pressure which piled up in the last couple of months in
Germany, running an exit-node in Germany is not encouraged anyway.
> I would think that a German middleman node would be safe, though, right?
If it's the only German node in the circuit: Possibly.
Alex.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iQCVAwUBR1Mn5BYlVVSQ3uFxAQK/fQQAqe496ityWEiTZovIazse0XpBusyV0G+8
Zn5mVkZpREl9J0PZ4uKFRB6ydwBZ1TJNFsMIbgHZhhGsJqstGBQBfR8U5gAI2FtS
kAEv62vTm8EPBOAUWx7UZKwuekmo2veQD0c5b/t77jaXUph067Qbdnh/7PnqQ7vn
ESTZOMavZis=
=i84f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----