[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: storage privacy (was: Nice quiet, private, anonymous life??)
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: storage privacy (was: Nice quiet, private, anonymous life??)
- From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 14:43:26 -0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:43:36 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=L2OpAuP8XMW32zjHv1vJnPwe8VJQVKc+WjjNPp/MCD0=; b=YZ/cUgoZTHuXcuAcXYukuyfQ//QOv6d6lGKPLOEE30gRI5JCKOmzXOpdBLftvbsXmfpgQCWlS69wMXCEsseLQzV/0jXM1Tdoo+58kJg6iKuGllHT6DzzSmnfOHgH7Wi9KaR/5QEfhZ9zz5SJtqkkxZqqNeU7v1gMVhPkueC06So=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=xQMOsxhBxT0tUhxMOZ/CkG1IR+9/rvdOUHghATs0loLx1NEndmBhqZzOApeT8p01SWDh+hKwlKXKhNuUz3dxpFWHbE6nRIcI3rljYntMqfFL09cbbJPisiT4uEhoK1D0gIPdIHpN147CBn2xof33oai4LGcnkvvEmUwjC12Kb3o=
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
apologies in advance for veering this far off topic...
On Dec 2, 2007 2:25 PM, F. Fox <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [ strange, dangerous, and likely to fail methods for destroying drives ]
use full disk encryption, even the latest ubuntu supports this.
destroy the disk keys and you've got platters full of entropy.
anything else is just a bad idea.
see the Tor Operational Security wiki page for more not bad ideas:
http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/OperationalSecurity
best regards,