[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: tor26 missing certificate messages today
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: tor26 missing certificate messages today
- From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:52:58 -0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:53:11 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zu4+tpZ0musFu5WEh0hI/3qVLK+0Qme2ACdGR1h4j+E=; b=LBYJdMXUHQe21owE3M7gppJ/2KUqs0DE6taVmevgIOUjbbL/DG0YA84ntUo5j2MZ57WMxHwoo//lXc2vniNmDGnPjcueCWxc+gmH85V4ZZQh1N72pFB5bYtHRQ0Ucgettp6ekcnerLHbx03P+q53IWhMHlrlw49T+590am+KrPc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qUPsO7DmVkv+w3iRs4/WGbsz2GzlEPH1jsGC1ZVVrTlK22LBvirA7pkmpsKpg/sdd367br3IL33mpsEJZUndmgFApnJc9xO+o4TDP3Z8+c8LMxqwVwzFO7Qmi/9GDDnmk7Cy4oI7q7rCDkHSQwJVvTNz+3HNxPjqSUDKxoagz8A=
- In-reply-to: <20071213014640.GP20802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200712100542.lBA5gMUR010310@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071213014640.GP20802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:42:22PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> Dec 09 16:03:08.509 [notice] We're missing a certificate from authority tor26 with signing key 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000: launching request.
>>
>> Does anyone know the reason for these messages? And the reason why they
>> eventually stopped appearing 53 minutes later?
>
> This is a bug (either with logging or some deeper confusion) that was
> triggered by adding a fourth v3 directory authority. I still don't know
> what the bug is, which means it's a good bet it'll show up when we add
> the fifth. :)
>
> But it seems to have resolved itself after one voting period, so I am
> not too worried.
>
> --Roger
>
Thank God for self-resolving bugs/errors that don't (or at least don't
seem to) have security implications. =:o)
Now if only more were like that... =;o)
- --
F. Fox: A+, Network+, Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHYyVqbgkxCAzYBCMRAtmMAKCCI14HC3MCeWYghE6s7kXZXzIFQQCdFmwg
aZ6OUr6JuaTNLA8W19iHENY=
=d1we
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----