[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[Part OT] Traffic shaping [Was: another seeming attack on my server's DirPort]

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Part OT] Traffic shaping [Was: another seeming attack on my server's DirPort]
From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:17:08 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:17:20 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o3y6vaPYsv1r90aJTW3opVSspYai06XIDBLgWuXdjL4=; b=VuuObrEiRndjRrBC58KE+TKNwc7efKAsnGKZ48n/rRmVxKEc452rWwX887B7MrN1+Kywp3CkJM4dDY4jYXEV/8QXEAsxat1ScedQmeowxIZzTJ0XVIxFYlvv1qBx/doDQkxcBAj9KFS+jxMv14mi0mPdsm5elj71Yswuv38NlbI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FmQRebQDaFx+lxRfO8LPGPA5bc0VPGFQ1A5YlaPI2PqOxMA+p5YjDfqNZoznWDLxmDBhiCz+3yzsCFtSqOwHUm+z84D7/ppS4iin8bp3R7v72JLO6aJUoPtxLkvSspZLAxfpj5717M1z0869rI2ui4iI7wctIjV2DbRFHTzqXIs=
In-reply-to: <3301.85.18.24.140.1198064258.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200712191011.lBJABqGO009471@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3301.85.18.24.140.1198064258.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I know on HyperWRT/Thibor, it has QoS functions for port ranges and
Ethernet ports.

I recently moved "kitsune" to an older machine (still enough for the
small amount of bandwidth I'm relaying anyway - and at least it's a
dedicated Linux box now!).

"Kitsune" got the farthest Ethernet port (#4) on the router's switch for
a reason. Why? Because I was able to set port-based QoS on #4 to "Low."

Doing that, I've actually been able to turn off manual bandwidth
limiting on "kitsune;" I let it do its own estimating, and attempt to
carry as much as it can handle.

I've had no problem, since my other computers get "first dibs" on
bandwidth, so to say. =:o)

- --
F. Fox: A+, Network+, Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHaWAkbgkxCAzYBCMRCMGcAJ9BcCI4UYeGJh/H0V2RWCZG9LJBFwCfSjsv
hhCt7iBJ20FV25wyt6Y+gGU=
=vsww
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: another seeming attack on my server's DirPort
  - From: Scott Bennett
- Re: another seeming attack on my server's DirPort
  - From: Marco Bonetti

Prev by Author: Re: Encrypted Web Pages?
Next by Author: Re: another seeming attack on my server's DirPort
Previous by thread: Re: another seeming attack on my server's DirPort
Next by thread: Re: another seeming attack on my server's DirPort
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread