[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Can Tor run WITHOUT Pivoxy ?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Can Tor run WITHOUT Pivoxy ?
From: "Jonathan D. Proulx" <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:17:53 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:18:01 -0500
In-reply-to: <20071228170330.a9b7b1a5.kazaam@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20071228151610.CC270140732E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071228170330.a9b7b1a5.kazaam@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 05:03:30PM +0100, kazaam wrote:
:And If I use Tor just for anonymous chatting? There's no need to put an http-proxy into tor. Also not everyone uses privoxy but polipo...

Also if you are only running a server there's no need for privoxy, and
other proxies could probably be made to do the job privoxy does.

But more to the point privoxy is made by different people and used for
many reasons other than TOR, so even if it were required for TOR it
wouldn't be one package.

-Jon

References:
- Can Tor run WITHOUT Pivoxy ?
  - From: Ben Stover
- Re: Can Tor run WITHOUT Pivoxy ?
  - From: kazaam

Prev by Author: Re: Encrypted Web Pages?
Next by Author: Re: Insecurities in Privoxy Configurations - Details
Previous by thread: Re: Can Tor run WITHOUT Pivoxy ?
Next by thread: Re: Can Tor run WITHOUT Pivoxy ?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread