[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: (Probably) a known problem?] - cant run a relay node



Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> phobos@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:34:40AM -0500, alexdonnini@xxxxxxxx wrote 2.1K bytes in 74 lines about:
> 
> > : > Nov 30 22:02:52.906 [Error] set_options(): Bug: Acting on config options left us
> > : > in a broken state. Dying.
> > : > Nov 30 22:02:52.906 [Warning] eventdns: Didn't find any nameservers.
> > : > Nov 30 22:02:52.906 [Warning] Could not config nameservers.
> > : > Nov 30 22:02:52.906 [Error] set_options(): Bug: Acting on config options left us
> > : > in a broken state. Dying.
> > 
> > A few things,  you probably haven't received a response because no one
> > has a good idea how to fix it.  You may have 2 issues, one is that
> > libevent can't find nameservers, and the other is that the config
> > options are broken.
> 
> While we're talking about DNS issues, I recently got:
>
> Nov 30 06:25:02.803 [notice] Tor 0.2.1.6-alpha (r17011) opening new log file.
> Nov 30 06:25:02.818 [warn] eventdns: Unable to add nameserver 164.148.169.81: error 2
> Nov 30 06:25:02.818 [warn] eventdns: Unable to add nameserver 34.148.169.81: error 2
> Nov 30 06:25:02.818 [warn] Unable to parse '/etc/resolv.conf', or no nameservers in '/etc/resolv.conf' (6)
> Nov 30 06:25:02.819 [err] set_options(): Bug: Acting on config options left us in a broken state. Dying.
> 
> The nameservers were indeed unreachable at that time
> (the traffic limit was reached and the system offline),
> but earlier Tor versions continued to run and started
> working again once the system was back on the net.

It's probably worth mentioning that this is a
relay server running on a GNU/Linux system.
 
Fabian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature