[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: User tor issue

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: User tor issue
From: Arjan <n6bc23cpcduw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:57:42 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:57:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <20081229193054.GB2154@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4958E102.2020903@xxxxxxxxx> <49590E11.9010607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081229193054.GB2154@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125)

phobos@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 06:51:13PM +0100, n6bc23cpcduw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote 0.5K bytes in 11 lines about:
> : Even with the 'much' higher traffic, it looks extremely slow to me with
> : an average of 100 - 200 bytes per second. Why doesn't traffic get
> : anywhere near the tor bandwidth limit settings?
> 
> If you've just started the server, it will take a while for clients to
> start using it as a relay.  Don't worry, Tor will consume all bandwidth
> you give it.

According to the yearly mrtg graph it never gets much higher:
http://pindarots.xs4all.nl/mrtg/tor.html

The torstatus graph agrees with mrtg:
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=5c7fc21ea828d2c2451bb1f5da191d59db1dd5cb

Follow-Ups:
- Re: User tor issue
  - From: phobos

References:
- User tor issue
  - From: Udo van den Heuvel
- Re: User tor issue
  - From: Arjan
- Re: User tor issue
  - From: phobos

Prev by Author: Re: User tor issue
Next by Author: Re: User tor issue
Previous by thread: Re: User tor issue
Next by thread: Re: User tor issue
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread