[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google DNS
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Google DNS
- From: Ted Smith <teddks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:04:43 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:12:54 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=ULNaaVJuKaO/SawgkJRmG0w1aEnj3EYg8rXykrg2nmc=; b=KehuQQsmrfzk+ga/bnsPBVl3CH4MMDe42kIdxl+TMogHzcwKFRoOfmGjwAbCoRTMMG KAE57CAwZAB86dDIeFCYIv45X1DyylNdiEhtRNTD3Ejov0hwbfwqGMANT7qNDRXqai94 hu4AGrQW3PEfLtUB5o9b2BoWZ5vKEIoGpUwos=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; b=gJNvRfpRZA6qZQVM+G6u7JTkzop3DyFUmLwi82fgy53uqbCm18r89fYqXuH07FLiK+ seYVpXIM8jng90b0BWc7/pCW3OERpY6zC+lmotSiOpIkyX+/XgMNc3UiegBsQfnEkNK8 pCL2qibMU4eZ711AzD97oY4Yc6r/fAHZHb0MA=
- In-reply-to: <4b1835ed.0e67f10a.4eb2.ffffc8e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4b1835ed.0e67f10a.4eb2.ffffc8e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 17:04 -0500, Erilenz wrote:
> Google launched a free recursive DNS resolver service today:
>
> http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/introducing-google-public-dns.html
>
> It doesn't hijack NXDOMAIN or do any other sort of filtering. Just
> thought I would mention it as the topic of countries blocking DNS
> lookups or Exits using OpenDNS comes up every so often.
>
I've always used Level3's servers (4.2.2.1-6, IIRC) because my ISP
intercepts NXDOMAIN. Is there a reason why I should switch? Does anyone
have any experience on Level3's servers? I've never had any problems,
but then I don't know anything about them with regards to data
retention, etc...
It would be very nice if there was a caching nameserver that could
resolve via tor-resolve, making multiple queries to weed out
censored/malicious results. Does anyone see any immediate problems with
this, or know of anything like it?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part