[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Freenode's (irc) Tor Catch 22? Two hidden services = zero?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Freenode's (irc) Tor Catch 22? Two hidden services = zero?
From: leandro noferini <lnoferin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:46:15 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:21:11 -0500
In-reply-to: <N1R-e8b6VzIq64@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (swinglowswinghigh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx's message of "Thu\, 3 Dec 2009 13\:46\:22 -0500")
References: <N1R-e8b6VzIq64@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)


[...]

I found this problem too but  as I could understand the registration for
the accounts with gpg  need to be made "by hand" by  the operators so we
need to wait one or two weeks.

I also be waiting.

-- 
Ciao
leandro

Attachment: pgpdRj5lwvOfc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Freenode's (irc) Tor Catch 22? Two hidden services = zero?
  - From: swinglowswinghigh

Prev by Author: Re: Why governments fund TOR?
Next by Author: Re: US Customers: anyone helping me?
Previous by thread: Freenode's (irc) Tor Catch 22? Two hidden services = zero?
Next by thread: Google DNS
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread