On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:03 PM, intrigeri
<intrigeri@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
hhhh xhdhx wrote (18 Dec 2010 16:13:59 GMT) :
> If u guys hav all the pieces of the puzzle togather then y not put
> it out in a simple package :-).
The preliminary testing I mentioned is quite different from "having
all the pieces of the puzzle together"; I am rather speaking of
managing to have a first two minutes torified VoIP discussion using
the mentioned tools.
About the "why not" thing, here's a hint: my spare time is not
infinite.
Also, I'd be pleased if you did not assume I and my accomplices are
all men.
Being from a country where phone tapping is rampant & the legal procedure behind it is opaque I could not contain my enthusiam.I will also keep in mind to be strictly gender neutral . If ther is an active VOIP for tor project I would be really happy to work on it.
> Also Id like to kno if ther are/were plans to put the hidden service
> descriptors into a DHT .
No idea what this DHT thing is. Is this related to the current thread,
or part of a different discussion (that would probably better fit
another thread)?
I was refering to the contact points the hidden services advertise.I think they are maintained in the directory servers now and not in DHT's like mentioned in the tor-design paper , correct me if I'm wrong .DHTs have their obvious security issues but I was wondering if people were experimenting with any designs like the gnunet dht .
| So what?