[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Is Taking Checksum of Packet Payloads a Vulnerability?

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Is Taking Checksum of Packet Payloads a Vulnerability?
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:00:14 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:00:30 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cRErNsHbAdfa/Eoh96s7WY4LglaErw4fuebTPogk8Us=; b=DslWvyNdj26lEA0pJidNXDMufaVZwJpEsyGwZKBY8/ZHi+/dcWgQ+SLvQ+qQDBo80A 52lpjSV6wC4d8yRJ6jm1Vxk4f9/BDFQVyLnijoXtY8DGkVYkchBmeKAn94L00AjzuSlI z1jqVPuEBDZg45dpA3ugtJ/UL5YRm74z4OpNQ=
In-reply-to: <CAAS2fgT5GooW8B9yFBJrQSRJsri6MCANxiEVHPJpB=FdJz323Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This mailing list is for all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing." <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CACy_D8iEizzxtVFBvagVETnr+iq7MwZTxZYyM+njhVV_7NkOrQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CACy_D8iProXLYrY4Sw_z5ys7q+HDCLZJy5LQ9jHg9SfEo5eu6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAAS2fgT5GooW8B9yFBJrQSRJsri6MCANxiEVHPJpB=FdJz323Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Cohen <danielc192@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Is this a problem with Tor's architecture? If so, has this issue
>> already been addressed?

See also discussion of this topic on tor-dev, where the original
poster cross-posted.

-- 
Nick
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

References:
- [tor-talk] Is Taking Checksum of Packet Payloads a Vulnerability?
  - From: Daniel Cohen
- Re: [tor-talk] Is Taking Checksum of Packet Payloads a Vulnerability?
  - From: Gregory Maxwell

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] [liberationtech] Not another Haystack right?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Automatic vulnerability scanning of Tor Network?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Is Taking Checksum of Packet Payloads a Vulnerability?
Next by thread: [tor-talk] 2 tests failing on 0.2.3.9 and 0.2.3.10
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread