[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Anonbib November papers without papers

Hash: SHA1

hey Sebastian,

Many thanks for taking care of this! anonbib is an important resource.

Could you please also add one more entry and include this research
paper with date September 2014? I am trying for over 1 week to find
time to do it but need to learn how to use bibtex/git.

It was announced here:

And the research paper is here:

We already have a fix for it suggested by Paul which seams fairly easy
to implement and shouldn't affect more than the load in the network
and on each relay:



On 12/22/2014 7:07 PM, Sebastian G. <bastik.tor> wrote:
> 22.12.2014, 13:35 Philipp Winter:
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:12:58PM +0100, Sebastian G.
>> <bastik.tor> wrote:
>>> while there are more pressing issue, or not I had noticed
>>> previously that all papers on anonbib from November 2014 have
>>> no papers. Well November wasn't over, but now it is December.
>>> Up to August 2014 papers have papers "attached" to them. I'm
>>> referring to the PDF files.
>>> Is there any reason why there aren't any papers.
>> You are referring to the WPES and CCS papers.  The reason for
>> that is that WPES and CCS are conferences whose papers are
>> published by the academic publisher ACM.  ACM is one of the worst
>> offenders in open access.  You can only read their research
>> papers after paying quite a bit of money.  For people who are not
>> affiliated with a university, it's typically too expensive to
>> obtain more than a few research papers.
>> That said, many researchers are nice enough to put their papers
>> online by themselves so that others can read them for free.
>> Somebody just has to search for these papers and then add the pdf
>> files to anonbib.
> So I did, by looking up their tiles and sending an email to anonbib
> with updated bibtex entires.
> Just "FARB: Fast Anonymous Reputation-Based Blacklisting without
> TTPs" couldn't be found by my short search, yet.
> ACM would charge $15 for non-members, $10 for members and $5 for
> ACM student members for the paper above. Without getting much to
> know about the paper, before buying it.
> I wonder if Allegany College of Maryland, which would be ACM as
> well or if Associated Colleges of the Midwest, which would also be
> ACM, get the same discount. They are Association for Computing
> Machinery, which is ACM, their ACM I guess.
> Not exactly what I call education-friendly. It doesn't have to be
> free, though free education would be desirable, but letting people
> access them for a reasonable amount of money should be
> considerable.
> Reminds me of Aaron Swartz and his effort to make JSTOR papers
> freely available.
>> Cheers, Philipp
> Cheers, Sebastian
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to