-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "I am not sure what is meant by "effective
deterrent" here. Does
this mean you guys would like to deter windows users from running servers? Or deter windows users period?" It means neither, because you've
kind of gotten it sideways.
What was meant by my comments was that the REASON you already don't see many W32 Tor servers is because everyone who tries to run them (or nearly everyone, anyway) is having problems KEEPING them running (if they can get them to run at all). It has absolutley nothing whatsoever to do with "restricting" anyone (in this case, all W32 users") from the Tor net or from running servers - although I would like to bring out myself that this may be the Tor developers only alternative (assuming W32 users can be identified and "blocked" at all) if W32 users overload the existing nodes, or bring about the possibility of government interference due to W32 (or others', of course) use of the Tor network for file-sharing. Hope that makes sense now. Pete -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQg5DJe2XOXeC4wlcEQKeLQCeOKssn4BT9Bf+zFHUDTEMTX2aVykAoKTy
BhmoQfGwimF/ConioWEA4zbW =CtnJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |