Re: Forwarding email ports

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Forwarding email ports
From: "Michael_google gmail_Gersten" <keybounce@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:45:20 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:45:31 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=B6w/M1Z7jv6D+IknQadqR1/E2w2lezqJg2nVSO0XrwX2rMzeoTbaAje1c5zI8dg5duTTDYRpX/YglNAIPwf9EhbOT+6tQQRomWiQFjTr4un2dad6c2wQGhfY2yCxc2DrBCu7S8ZHptIoO0QhholjNcJVvdCHSfEv5Nv2i34C5lY=
In-reply-to: <45C759FF.6060300@csuohio.edu>
References: <1bd71ad80702042018w3aca6440yf43e7d5d69c8fffd@mail.gmail.com> <45C759FF.6060300@csuohio.edu>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Nope .. 587 is an alternative to 25. Unlike the other two, it's not
encrypted.


Whoops! I've taken that one off my list of ports then.

As for blocking IP, I'm dynamic :-).

References:
- Forwarding email ports
  - From: Michael_google gmail_Gersten
- Re: Forwarding email ports
  - From: Michael Holstein