[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:22:53 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:23:03 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1BARYnuDnWOn3VcqwofXrbMqeH+HCm/NXFzbaQG4Fh0=; b=wIiq2Zoysw8H7SVkXTuwjxMNaDP1mjENixO5poP/dM3GEuEzGQtfD5C+yTbkoDl3jky6lOMYqb93LuoWKzicha6uUaiMcT8KwnwlwJa5UOIrSQ7fKFpr/N1CueOVFK/Gr7oUZOOp4Sq6gDqb1cQ6+pbFhiogGPBe++6qkNoCT/0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EYxGY3mLvZtVNvd/N8FCaO+uzMPdc4EtnMcksTZneZ94/y9PjlyTDihEbaE7aUS5MAubi8FRrSf1KCVbBUt8W9hBr+ow+huP6Yr5syPCl7yelpIM1R3JacsicbGD3rsiGVEh72lYCepvNnMbnCJHDlCokIjiddQijiTIaYxWyMo=
In-reply-to: <20080202004734.GQ20802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <003901c8634e$1d4a0bd0$57de2370$@org> <006401c8635e$45c911e0$d15b35a0$@org> <20080131153154.GA23274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080201050018.GA4882@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080202004734.GQ20802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071018)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Roger Dingledine wrote:
(snip)
> (It's unclear what anonymity impact this might have, but it might be
> substantial: if a lot of our potential paths through the network involve
> a slow link, and we discard all those potential paths, that would make
> a big difference. On the other hand, that's exactly the point.)
(snip)

Sounds like we have ourselves a conundrum, and a tradeoff. =:oD

- --
F. Fox
AAS, CompTIA A+/Network+/Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQIVAwUBR6PT/ej8TXmm2ggwAQiQwxAApBiCb4ulVs8v/ZJ/4xwQF0l2vLOdDDIr
zDfVGVj/bGdXJExf572STcQyOQ2jCGQYANvlt0nfeCto/7M2mVKEclHS5HvodUga
TUSmiZ1cRZTIwWBBqBTA2PXSIp0PWutka5TpMcdSQeLek0IRfI+KvSCfdDj+I4HW
OtrN+hNP8RHHRBiNi73/mL3opvRnG9Qr5RlNE9YBlqTAMb5SIWoKPVsu0cio52Rw
8J8ddnc9ciYvbTmJa5mnvlg4FiTB8QpK3SHJi6OyglMasJt00x3PFQb9lNcnrSzU
gBdCS/lYgmkxzFL/XWxNKrPqdoRO4zrhlDswBJJo4Gs7UgSbZbfTSFgzu+KYMHjX
AhU+pjpYu4uitikmsWA0Lq+0j7ZXgzc+Q0wq4RKDs+XZmO4fI5gBGmYpZyEljwJV
v/oGd+HXXWM7P3Ej0VV4Nwk+P50Vah9SYDBqDFogbId/N1ZcBAEzvuKWzDe/D46+
vkM1/bKQIz2Rq2WPus+GRruJ/tbf0PEqA9aE7MAJhDQRmx1PYEEfvHnbHj/qPAFV
EoOEaHVW5hR03k7qdCfXssJ8/txP5ktYy7RytMLX71GxdmmIRUeTPrG/zGczOlzX
L8QR9/8pQXpLrak3GNFZP6tjKzHDidGu/UPuKd5s4N9uBY4LQhgdTE2eIlU/C/lk
T1m6EQdXTsc=
=C+MP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.
  - From: Mike Perry
- Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: Re: Odd behavior: same entry/exit node + more
Next by Author: Re: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
Previous by thread: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
Next by thread: Re: About WLAN and monitoring..
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread