[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)

To: <or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
From: "Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu" <chad-jm@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:48:12 -1100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:49:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <20080202172923.GE20341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200802020806.m1286Hm9010342@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080202172923.GE20341@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AchlwWLBTS5GA1WPRQ21VN/h+/XoqwAAlPkw

> By increasing the minimum requirement for a Tor node, you reduce the
> geographical distribution of Tor nodes, making cross-jurisdiction
> routing more unlikely; it would be better to investigate ways to reduce
> traffic overhead (if this is possible) to allow more people to run Tor
> nodes.

Does TOR implement QOS or prioritization? That is only use bandwidth when
other traffic is not present?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
  - From: Csaba Kiraly
- Re: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
  - From: F. Fox

References:
- Re: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
  - From: Scott Bennett
- Re: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
  - From: Dave Page

Prev by Author: RE: The use of malicious botnets to disrupt The Onion Router
Next by Author: Won't connect
Previous by thread: Re: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
Next by thread: Re: Not using slow circuits (was Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread