[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia
From: "Marco Bonetti" <marco.bonetti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:55:44 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:56:05 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <47B2D65F.2020408@xxxxxxxx>
References: <47B2D65F.2020408@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6

On Wed, February 13, 2008 12:37, Jan Reister wrote:
> Does that make sense?
To me, absolutely not.
It's basically saying that if I can reroute ip packets you're going to
send to server X to my own rogue server Y, I'm able to read your requests
and disrupting your anonimity.
I'm guessing if the author ever heard about public key cryptography ;-)

-- 
Marco Bonetti
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://workaround.ch/
Linux-live for powerpc: http://workaround.ch/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live/
My webstuff: http://sidbox.homelinux.org/

My GnuPG key id: 0x86A91047

References:
- OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia
  - From: Jan Reister

Prev by Author: Re: I can upgrade a Debian HPPA tor node
Next by Author: Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia
Previous by thread: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia
Next by thread: Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread