Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)
From: Andrew <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:51:16 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:51:27 -0500
In-reply-to: <47B72DC4.1080102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <259474.39563.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47B72DC4.1080102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Ben Wilhelm schrieb:

[snip]

(That was actually kind of fun to work out.)

-Ben


It was fun to read, too! Thanks for doing this (and sorry for OT ;)).
Andrew

References:
- Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)
  - From: Anon Mus
- Re: Compromised entry guards rejecting safe circuits (was Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia)
  - From: Ben Wilhelm