[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: OSI 1-3 attack on Tor? in it.wikipedia



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Anon Mus wrote:
> F. Fox wrote:
(snip)
>>
>> Umm... unless you're talking about lists of *compromised* keys (i.e.,
>> stolen, like via malware), then this is pure FUD. Trying to figure
> out
>> the private key by other means, is pretty infeasible.
>>
>>
>>   
(snip)
> The contents of any file may be stolen by
> 
> spyware.

Thank you for backing me up.

Here's another copy of my previous statement:
"unless you're talking about lists of *compromised* keys (I.E., STOLEN,
LIKE VIA MALWARE.)"

Notice the portion in all caps.

> 
> Of course you may not really be than dumb.
(snip)

Looks more like you can't read.

- --
F. Fox
AAS, CompTIA A+/Network+/Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=3/QF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----