[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tor relay shutted down by ISP

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tor relay shutted down by ISP
From: Tom Hek <tomtorexitnode@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:14:13 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:14:41 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E+6U/BmlVSwwNnGHOi+NaPH6TZ4k7siPd3Bf3v372Ns=; b=bnN+qVn3gX8pmY/w7XYxVE7HyOnX0959uWV3NH0MXwbQQr2achmVHv5vXXNTwSFE6phh5IWGbj3LJ5GK6CaHYorKg0xBxr4Y/oqKuPTGJPXNBVeIlH0h8beiuTVb1wtTvIdrEIZjx7Lqwl2pO49PUlC7dnW0K2cRNGYR4gTXpT4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gIhDxKxs/p8bHZYQKED0xbgrU0N3AWaZhpRuuw7UM8/9/mdslSUyUunT93ZJR1muHf4AGq6WMceN1yvnVp/Ce6Myz9BzvufQd3hNIcRwTtuAA8jzecJlnz+URYMS5DqWmvlPElL1aSD5rbixbtHfslzqMYVMrItsB2tWcP+N5jk=
In-reply-to: <47BC5D31.6040807@xxxxxxx>
References: <47BC53BC.7080707@xxxxxxxxx> <3922422b0802200834h2576bf0iaf4b6c444a670896@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47BC587C.8020101@xxxxxxxxx> <47BC5D31.6040807@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jon McLachlan wrote:
> If you just run a middle node, nothing "that bad" should come spewing
> out of your box.  I would be curious if you were running an exit node
> originally, or if it was just a middle node.
> 
> In the tor-config file, there's some exit policies -> if you reject *:*,
> then you're essentially a middle-node, in which everything is both 1)
> encrypted and 2) between tor-to-tor traffic (which will almost certainly
> generate no future complaints)....

I chose to be an exit node because I wanted to donate my bandwidth to
other Tor users. I've been running a middle-node for several years but I
think that good end nodes are needed too, so I decided to start running
an end node.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAke8X+UACgkQStmJ9+mkUHNJNACdHAvOmlExAcW0cmgdYrmorqaA
LcgAn0UhhdlQd/gUcaEzwX0P8p2QO8if
=358F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Tor relay shutted down by ISP
  - From: Tom Hek
- Re: Tor relay shutted down by ISP
  - From: Ringo Kamens
- Re: Tor relay shutted down by ISP
  - From: Tom Hek
- Re: Tor relay shutted down by ISP
  - From: Jon McLachlan

Prev by Author: Re: Tor relay shutted down by ISP
Next by Author: Re: Tor relay shutted down by ISP
Previous by thread: Re: Tor relay shutted down by ISP
Next by thread: Re: Tor relay shutted down by ISP
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread