[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: use of SCTP in volunteer relay networks (a bit off-topic)
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: use of SCTP in volunteer relay networks (a bit off-topic)
- From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:09:49 -0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:09:55 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qQsdxeZH/sF6wLkeVCqDj0CrlxS9eAmTOCDe8iXKkYE=; b=R7LxcjNYPc0D51nkauVx/11lw2iB6GNM3yEyTW59CS4+0ytiyzOuNd7OGl9UeW9JOY 5l/2AXXmF6H6ej9AZdb1Dm7YC7cC2JkImd5HXP39Qkp9cU/bLghT6BaL2/VSy4wVPnC7 mc7gzHAtizLa/7e3qUXQgr7ua5xpN9s7Q2Qr0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=RcZQwpMSsZ+7u80OQX9Wh2tHGDWYrTfu5Y8/yy7ur1/6NBgzpqQLtZhdhtkrt41/8M Ig1tVPfcGG6RjZ5ockCHZHH5NeciZd9nHQyEZYIfN6BGdsJu7wYBqIKxqaXxJbUAkVsn pICRY4PouHGqdWAXxOMwAD/cnINPrFw8mjoVQ=
- In-reply-to: <20090213140623.GA5075@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200902131327.n1DDRAhN015842@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090213140623.GA5075@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Drake Wilson wrote:
> Quoth Scott Bennett <bennett@xxxxxxxxxx>, on 2009-02-13 07:27:10 -0600:
>>> TCP connection has much more of this than would be present if one were
>>> using the underlying packet network more directly, I think.)
>> But I don't think reimplementing all of that over UDP is necessarily
>> the optimal way to go about it.
>
> I'm not sure who proposed reimplementing Tor with UDP... ?
>
(snip)
It's listed in this document, though I don't know who the original
proposer(s) were:
https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/roadmaps/2008-12-19-roadmap-full.pdf
- --
F. Fox
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=QVfM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----