[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:43:47 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:44:02 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/oBPdGyKvcjCh7ECchY7cI+wnUtwTNrmsRQbjCCEnhs=; b=KF1fKwb5nii7/g2cea+XT/qOCWew3btJ9oqT0x5DlZyrqvnf7/18YA0vKOGxQFy+GM eB0I61nhS+t26diqUi6YEOSNHsqPRflNkBIbIxhbtg3OLqGUZJYrg7D/wGXg0/SB2FGv DIl6cmtUyc7LmKgcLn/x4wxbqbEMRe0akvSD8Xus/v3KdXz2wVjS1z9D34tLimDacedu u9xnayKVJoti2lZlpLuugWhBi6eUnGwAd4UsRGVBCtxNcVOl0lOwGnRBghA9LJk+Q9VU pNw0tMXeiCUNJNvokEzuNkrwvQQHYtZaDvwm64fQ7yYdRIpBgu0vMofOiAerx/Hdc6FU 2jkQ==
In-reply-to: <CAAd2PDL1oNXcmvX0Vk=7cbo3r9V4viYjKOfdZcrmsnuAdpUGrQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <mailman.239.1455936375.3047.tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160219214406.0000130f@xxxxxxxxxxx> <56C800F2.9020108@xxxxxxxxx> <0968d98d629bf8ad78497f5719e51c3b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160221003840.GC10235@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CADL2u4joDoQebmy5hZVt2b7N=3YT8Jpv8cJ8pcRM6sKWqopzEQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56C987E4.2020500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAAd2PDL1oNXcmvX0Vk=7cbo3r9V4viYjKOfdZcrmsnuAdpUGrQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 2/22/16, Green Dream <greendream848@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>...
> Interesting. Any idea what they're able to enumerate with the modified
> version of Tor?

they're able to enumerate the onions which land on their node(s) per
O(1) mapping in HSDir participants. e.g. "get lucky"



> Can the Tor network be hardened from this client-side
> "attack"?

see also: "Hidden Services Need Some Love"
 - https://blog.torproject.org/blog/hidden-services-need-some-love


best regards,
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

References:
- [tor-talk] Tracking blocker
  - From: Paul A. Crable
- Re: [tor-talk] Tracking blocker
  - From: Jeremy Rand
- [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
  - From: CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA
- Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
  - From: RenÃ Ladan
- Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
  - From: nusenu
- Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
  - From: Green Dream

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] [guardian-dev] orplug, an Android firewall with per-app Tor circuit isolation
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] FPGA Tor Relay
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] luakt
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread