[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] tor-talk Digest, Vol 85, Issue 16



February 6th, 2018 For Immediate Release:

What happened to 1970s America compassion?

Contributor, Host, Producer, Author:  Daniel Roy Baron (California) Talk
Show Host and Board of Directors member President of Win Win Internationals
(see bio at bottom of release)

Interview - Contact winwininternationals@xxxxxxxxx, or call Daniel Roy
Baron directly at 619-430-7236

Preview:
The for profit political prisons in America create Jim Crow slavery worse
than before the Civil War
The rich white racists control our "divide & conquer" have based legal,
political and media systems
If compassion were in charge, all of our problems can begin to be solved.
The idea that power tends to corrupt is how our wealthy Elites treat have
nots in our caste systems favoring the rich
Our fellow anti Trump #resist marchers work to shine a bright light on
what's broken in our REALLY Raw America "Homeless, Have Nots, Minorities,
Refugees, Immigrants, LGBTQ".
Let's see how we can all help EMBARK upon compassion in 2018 and beyond
____________________________________________________________

The latest podcast talk show episode on Punk Rock Politics Podcast is now
up!

We talk about our RAW America; private prisons, homelessness, and the King
Deng Foundation.

What is broken and reality solutions on how to help Africa, Asia, America
and our world w/ compassion, helping to meet the needs & equality of all
people.

Learn from our YouTube what's broken in Raw America concerning our
homeless, refugees, immigrants, minorities, LGBTQ, disenfranchised have
nots and our compassionate solutions for a better tomorrow.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R16ZqfL5g8&feature=youtu.be

Thank you Michael Cole w/ Punk Rock Politics Podcast for our really RAW
human being podcast.

Media Contact: For an interview or article contact with over 40,000 on most
social media @DanielRoyBaron

Phone: (619) 430-7236
Email: winwininternationals@xxxxxxxxx

www.WinWinInternationals.com/about

Author: Looking Glass Shattered. Most of us are too busy to do an autopsy
on America since the 1970s. Daniel Roy Baron is ready to jump into what's
broke and how to fix it.

Learn more about his two books and what is Looking Glass Shattered America?

http://winwininternationals.com/books/

Here is our latest episode on Win Win YouTube; our criminal justice system
in America is only for rich racist white people.

https://youtu.be/nXK7X6nlYWI

Bio: www.LinkedIn.com/DanielRoyBaron



On Feb 18, 2018 4:00 AM, <tor-talk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Send tor-talk mailing list submissions to
>         tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         tor-talk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         tor-talk-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of tor-talk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Launching new tabs in existing TBB from the shell
>       (Lars Noodén)
>    2. Re: Launching new tabs in existing TBB from the shell (Rusty Bird)
>    3. Re: Tor Talk Failing Authentication (Ben Tasker)
>    4. Re: ip-api.com sees me (Anon Hyde)
>    5. Tor4 (Anon Hyde)
>    6. Re: NYC Event 2/15: Discussion Questions (Anon Hyde)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 22:31:06 +0200
> From: Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Tor Talk <tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Launching new tabs in existing TBB from the
>         shell
> Message-ID: <4c3a1b57-e0bd-fa64-9a81-88eb6feac49f@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> On 02/17/2018 10:28 PM, Rusty Bird wrote:
> >...
> >> The --allow-remote --new-tab method works fine with unmodified Firefox,
> >> just not with TBB.
> >
> > Strange, it works here with TB 7.5 on Whonix. If you really started
> > the _master_ process (not just the tab opener!) using --allow-remote
> > as well, then I don't know what's happening. Maybe try "ps -ef | grep
> > firefox" to verify that the parameter has been passed to the firefox
> > binary.
> >
> > Rusty
>
> Just a guess but would I have to specify a particular browser profile as
> well if there are multiple instance of Firefox running concurrently in
> the same account?
>
> /Lars
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:41:40 +0000
> From: Rusty Bird <rustybird@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tor Talk <tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Launching new tabs in existing TBB from the
>         shell
> Message-ID: <20180217204140.GA2263@mutt>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Lars Noodén:
> > Just a guess but would I have to specify a particular browser profile as
> > well if there are multiple instance of Firefox running concurrently in
> > the same account?
>
> I'd definitely try that, in various combinations.
>
> Last time I looked into it, firefox --allow-remote used some baroque
> X11 property based method to find and communicate with the master
> process.
>
> Rusty
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 931 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/
> attachments/20180217/590b6d4f/attachment-0001.sig>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 21:21:57 +0000
> From: Ben Tasker <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor Talk Failing Authentication
> Message-ID:
>         <CABMkiz7MNf6Ph+mJS+iZdX1mZJRmjLMyxn3viYPU05D5Ux+
> jKA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> It's a commonly known issue with mailing lists
>
> If you've got DKIM enabled on your domain example.com, when mailman (or
> whatever) inserts headers the hash will no longer match.
>
> If you've got SPF enabled on example.com then the mailing list server
> almost certainly isn't included. When the receiving MTA checks the domain
> in the from header those checks will fail.
>
> There are ways around the DKIM issue. either stripping the sig completely
> at the mailing list server (might cause more failures) or heavily
> restricting the headers used in hashing at the sending MTA.
>
> For the SPF side, not much you can do (assuming you don't want to add
> various 3rd party controlled servers to your spf record). Only real answer
> is for the list to send from its own domain, but then you start losing
> useful functionality.
>
>
>
> On 17 Feb 2018 19:06, "Wanderingnet" <wanderingnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know why Tor Talk entries are consistently flagged as failing
> domain authentication, thereby as potentially spoofed?
>
> Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted
> email.
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 03:57:07 -0500
> From: Anon Hyde <mail@xxxxxxx>
> To: "tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] ip-api.com sees me
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+PoCUGD=8-ks6Mhg4AMahe7=6+MvhVKiToyFtRuZqYVJNWHsQ@mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On 2/17/18, Wanderingnet <wanderingnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > not be snooped. I seem to be unable now to locate the page, but this
> would
> > solve many of the problems of bad nodes in the Tor network, at least if a
> > filtered network composed solely of such systems were used. Of course,
> you
> > would wonder why this hadn't been done if it were possible...but then
> again,
>
> slow down not so hard guys!
> i mean "bad" node for me, for user, not for onionwork.
>
> i'm rookie in using the tor, and have some TORubles, which can be
> studied to improve the subject. first of all, you must reading the
> Interface by JRaskin all the time. i'm rookie for tor, but have some
> skills in computing, otherwise I would not have managed with the
> TORubles.
>
> So, most often this is
>  1) very bad/slow connection with/across  the node
>  2) captcha
>  3) blacklist
>  4) traffic redirection to hostile territory
>
> theOnion should provide to lamer a convenient interface for fast
> editing the ExcludeNodes list and method to share it. with onion URL
> for example.
>
> Q: by the way, why onion need dot-onion for URL?
>      is it possible used just hash without dot?
>
> And another one news: under linux (opera and chrome) ip-api.com
> showing my real ip not every time. So far I have no idea why
>
> WBR
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 04:22:04 -0500
> From: Anon Hyde <mail@xxxxxxx>
> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [tor-talk] Tor4
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+PoCUE9CrimsG_pBHh9Hzmp4uAmDNhovYQc4s+WHqef+
> VQ1+w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On 2/17/18, Scfith Riseup <scfith@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > You are already using protonmail, so you are already a shill. Electronic
> > devices leave signatures and vulnerable to collection & traffic
> analysis. I
>
> actually, we have best of the best tool for secure talking and meeting.
> strictly from peer to peer.
> why the tor-talk community does not using the subject for this
> conversation?
> I propose a new topic, so what are you use for the torus except the
> browser?
> And make a modest contribution:
> https://github.com/andrewingor/hellShell/blob/master/screenshot.png
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 04:40:50 -0500
> From: Anon Hyde <mail@xxxxxxx>
> To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] NYC Event 2/15: Discussion Questions
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+PoCUGV4pKNC-VQB19D_+YFfxxeAasop+dWHj3ua5KKTWVJmg@
> mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On 2/17/18, George <george@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > * Why is Tor {weak|underutilized} *there*?/What causes the waves and
> > troughs in Tor usage in a particular country?
> >
> > This question arose in the context of certain countries which see
> > significant jumps then declines in usage. The well-known cases of usage
> > spikes is usually tied to political turbulence in a particular country,
> > in which internet censorship becomes a tactic of repression. But in
> > other cases, there might be the adoption of "real identity" tied to
> > online accounts, or blocking of specific messaging applications.
> >
>
> I'm talking about this, and repeat:
>
>  1) bad connection to some node, because "goodguys" to block it, or owned
> it.
>  2) captcha/blacklist, because "goodguys" generated lot of bad traffic
>  3) forged DNS by "goodguys", using dnscrypt is not simple
>  4) turn traffic to hostile territory, where is "goodguys" could control
> it.
>
> It is necessary to give to lamer the opportunity to manage this.
>
> cheers,
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of tor-talk Digest, Vol 85, Issue 16
> ****************************************
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk