[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: privacy

To: Zinco <zinco@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: privacy
From: Peter Palfrader <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:07:47 +0100
Cc: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:08:12 -0500
In-reply-to: <20050126022308.A14AF33CC2@moria.seul.org>
Mail-followup-to: Zinco <zinco@xxxxxxxxxxx>, or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20050126022308.A14AF33CC2@moria.seul.org>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Zinco wrote:

> I for one feel very violated when it comes to my privacy.

> And now this kind of stuff:
> 
> 2005/01/25  09:49:07  [->] REJECTED - Source is BayTSP - Epoch Networks 2  PGIPDB (206.135.121.30) [Protocol: TCP - src: 54173 / dst: 9030]

Maybe _you_ should STOP advertising that port as a directory mirror if
you don't want to provide the service.

| router ztorproxy 67.181.34.1 9001 9050 9030
                               ^^^^      ^^^^

You block both ports, 9001 and 9030.  Not very clever thing to do for a
server.

-- 
Peter

References:
- privacy
  - From: Zinco

Prev by Author: Re: Tor 0.0.9.1 crashed
Next by Author: Re: hostile node anonymity attack scenario
Previous by thread: privacy
Next by thread: 0.0.9.3 and hidden services
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread