[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
facility for specifying that a Tor node should not be preferred?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: facility for specifying that a Tor node should not be preferred?
- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joehall@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:22:42 -0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:22:48 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=U3HACI0V9crrL+mhCaYj7LZqdv6eQmo66ZD++OqXqihlH/tgr76tKm8ZYeeTiXktJz4KM5LTJ5j86MgBX8PY2IK6a2t5DnpDULhHZssombGwXZh0D0LA3PJnWO+HmppcpsXEZ0pMBQ/Vgx3pM2sy4Ip5sLYJeW7ZFkrupQmoi9k=
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi, I was wondering if there was much interest in what would
effectively be the opposite of Tor's ExitNodes argument. That is, it
would be nice to be able to specify that a node should never be a
"preferred" exit node. -Joe
PS: Barring that, what's the longest set of exit policies that a node
has ever run on? Did it cause problems? Would it make more sense (in
terms of network efficiency, etc.) to block exits on port 80 or to
have a long (thousands of entries) set of exit policies? What would
happen if all nodes ran with exit policies that were thousands of
lines long?
--
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
<http://josephhall.org/>