On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:53:22AM +0100, "K. Neß" wrote: > Hi, > > does it really run tor version 0.1.0.16 ? > > May be, its time to upgrade, or does you have a reason for using the old > version for a new middle-man? Allright, the ubuntu packages are apparently way out of date. Thanks for pointing that out. I've fixed things accordingly to http://www.brainonfire.net/2006/10/08/upgrade-tor-latest-version-ubuntu/ Raising maximum number of filedescriptors (ulimit -n) to 8192. Starting tor daemon: tor... Jan 12 11:30:00.512 [notice] Tor v0.1.1.26. This is experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. Jan 12 11:30:00.513 [notice] Initialized libevent version 1.1a using method epoll. Good. Jan 12 11:30:00.513 [notice] connection_create_listener(): Opening OR listener on 0.0.0.0:9001 Jan 12 11:30:00.514 [notice] connection_create_listener(): Opening Directory listener on 0.0.0.0:9030 done. Firewall is reporting traffic (cool, never knew there's RRD graphs in there as well). Anything else? (This thing is a pure middleman, remember). > > > Eugen Leitl schrieb: > > Does this look good, or do I have to change anything? > > https://tns.nighteffect.com/router_detail.php?FP=f0af51625a9306417dc20d9fefea614c7ebf722d > > > > Regarding thread > > > > http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Sep-2006/msg00107.html > > > > did any of the German tor *middleman* operators get any > > nasty mail or visits from officials? > > -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature