[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: 100% CPU - again

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 100% CPU - again
From: phobos@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:59:59 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:00:15 -0500
In-reply-to: <N1B-csrDEDrvhO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <N1B-csrDEDrvhO@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:21:51AM -0500, lg2005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote 0.2K bytes in 1 lines about:
: Sorry to come back with this problem, but where does it come from? The older releases of Tor/Vidalia didn't use 100% CPU during  afew minutes, so (sorry to ask so directly!) why isn't it fixed in the last release?

Well, we don't know what the issue is. Nor can we recreate the issue
ourselves.  Therefore, we need more data.  Can you give Tor/Vidalia some
sort of output which shows what calls are being made while Tor/Vidalia
is at 100%?  

In unix world this could be strace, oprofile, or gdb output.  I'm not
sure which OS you have, but more data about what Tor/Vidalia are doing
would be great.  

https://bugs.torproject.org for tor issues, or
http://trac.vidalia-project.net/wiki/ReportingBugs for Vidalia issues.

Thanks.

-- 
Andrew

References:
- 100% CPU - again
  - From: lg2005

Prev by Author: Re: Huh?
Next by Author: Re: Tor slow no matter what I do.
Previous by thread: 100% CPU - again
Next by thread: What does mean this message?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread