[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Hypothetical: Totalitarian regimes & virtual servers abroad?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Hypothetical: Totalitarian regimes & virtual servers abroad?
- From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:51:44 -0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:51:56 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jVuOZaJegz8rSpVx7SkDM3lM/SRnBb+YQQ7zhxTnk78=; b=u4T7zsPMoyXoHMP7RoeNTWhv6NwrgfCbvx6QQyBRh5wcgygjuJG1krIefoQceaGarT6dsuhNHGLxSUG+60I+cZuVLsuc1bX7BeQesDp6VqBz4C6OFgtZWVnGO7N3EhXqqpc5hvrTO9fByA26i4xu3mKuv0m4EfiEhewiiEWe/3A=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EfjXzg/sSgGWxDs+oqccMpiFQDIUE5yuVzbmwwTfS2rJw+J8XJZY+81WtY56CWpLlc9bViEd8Ltiarc9GPpcGnPkrpLszGpp/hwmQ5n8G1M8CmdaH48LQfVdnAPInpiNTmB7aa2ItqLnxABgNggh73XEUx6VEb2Pd6iy7q8elZY=
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071018)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
I've been thinking about the recent threads involving our recent
contributor from China, and the idea of excluding nodes by country - in
this case, excluding Chinese nodes, for the purposes of circumventing
the Great Firewall.
However, such an approach relies on the ability to tie an IP address to
geography. This led me to something that while simple, could break this
entire approach:
What if the Chinese government were to open virtual server accounts in
other countries? Assuming they had massive connectivity (which some
locations do - there's such a place near me, which hosts among other
things, Google), malicious Tor nodes could be run on them.
Since excluding by geography would be useless, they'd only need to sit
back and wait.
Any thoughts?
- --
F. Fox: A+, Network+, Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=Y74V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----