[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: User tor issue

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: User tor issue
From: Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:31:45 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:31:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <49664431.7010709@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <4958E102.2020903@xxxxxxxxx> <49590E11.9010607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49591236.1070707@xxxxxxxxx> <49591A5F.7070602@xxxxxxxxx> <4ef5fec60812291053x7c81d678sb0a1e58bb8d876f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49591F59.8090401@xxxxxxxxx> <4ef5fec60812291119n62b4f90etbc86ca12a420ab45@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <495A35FB.8010004@xxxxxxxxx> <4ef5fec60812300754k3f5459c0ga2ec968c006ed939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4964D11B.4050903@xxxxxxxxx> <49664431.7010709@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)

Udo van den Heuvel wrote:

Udo van den Heuvel wrote:

I am using that patch (and others) to be sure that openssl uses the via
padlock hardware:

yes, you're fine.


Still the debug log showed that we don't use the hardware accelleration.
How can we find out why?


Shall I file a bug?


http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=907

Follow-Ups:
- Re: User tor issue
  - From: Udo van den Heuvel

References:
- Re: User tor issue
  - From: Udo van den Heuvel
- Re: User tor issue
  - From: Udo van den Heuvel

Prev by Author: Re: User tor issue
Next by Author: tor over ipv6
Previous by thread: Re: User tor issue
Next by thread: Re: User tor issue
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread