[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Anonymity risks of 2 vs 3 hops

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Anonymity risks of 2 vs 3 hops
From: emigrant <fromwindowstolinux@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:35:28 +0530
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:05:37 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bpjj+wWwU5j2LRmNXvcO1E30Gp1MkgA77lhoiI5PHPw=; b=u6/PO7f91WMhWjt8Yo4xFvAL/psZjmLqYXJvWZljuPGYuo21N8A8W24zp7mHW6yRfq 6TslQks5QyH1RQdVe2jSQ2z9xSyqghTKfiIa23iZ2U/p3po2Qpf0QPuE2Z5ZXDDiu30b qGOrpwETIo1hHW0SPtVdYS5h3p6utoZ3s6UuE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=rRi/dkm8JKbhjisdMeqOag9kqKfGMI6mmsFmPfEEobQi+3DImJXiMWL6akC4QvBQkp UfbTJZruu0cLYTHOThfNl3609rGuQQIg74/BX+JUwJsO8T2tNFz6vlWeyscRSqGS6xLT FcmGjnEwWatkN8zqKzbie3990aHXniuskp0gU=
In-reply-to: <1263045678.5406.16.camel@arshad-desktop>
References: <b0d6ed5e1001081156v7f534cb9jcb3117fb10655a65@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1263045678.5406.16.camel@arshad-desktop>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 19:31 +0530, emigrant wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 11:56 -0800, Sam Peterson wrote:
> > Having read the heated discussion regarding some people's suggestion
> > on the list to provide an option to reduce the number of hops in a
> > circuit, I'm curious about something and was wondering if someone
> > smarter than I could enlighten me.
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> 
> May i know why people need to reduce the number of hosts?
> i prefer it be increased instead.
> 

i meant to say hops (not hosts) sorry.
> ***********************************************************************
> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/




***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

References:
- Anonymity risks of 2 vs 3 hops
  - From: Sam Peterson
- Re: Anonymity risks of 2 vs 3 hops
  - From: emigrant

Prev by Author: Re: Anonymity risks of 2 vs 3 hops
Next by Author: REQ a link for how to set up exit nodes....
Previous by thread: Re: Anonymity risks of 2 vs 3 hops
Next by thread: exitnodes
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread