[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-talk] Bridge: Why not just stateless TCP socket proxy / forwarders?

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tor-talk] Bridge: Why not just stateless TCP socket proxy / forwarders?
From: "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:58:56 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:59:11 -0500
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This mailing list is for all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing." <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.25) Gecko/20111213 Thunderbird/3.1.17

Hi,

does Bridge really need to be Tor Servers?

Why they can't be just be simpler TCP socket proxy?

-naif
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-talk] Bridge: Why not just stateless TCP socket proxy / forwarders?
  - From: andrew

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] How to make 100.000 bridge?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Bridge: Why not just stateless TCP socket proxy / forwarders?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] How to install tor in Linux just as secure as tor-browser-bundle ?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Bridge: Why not just stateless TCP socket proxy / forwarders?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread