[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] how to answer in tree (mailing list)?



> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:36 AM,  <proper@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Am 2012-01-19 15:52, schrieb proper@xxxxxxxxxxx:
>>>> How to correctly answer into an existing tree?
>>>
>>> By correctly setting the "In-Reply-To" and "References" headers of your
>>> mail. "In-Reply-To" is to be set to the value of the "Message-ID"
>>> header
>>> (the message ID) of the mail you want to reply to. "References"
>>> contains
>>> a list of message IDs: the message ID of the mail you're replying to,
>>> the message ID of the mail that previous mail is a reply to and so on.
>>>
>>> Unless you're using a completely broken mail client, your mail client
>>> will do that for you automatically if you use the "Reply" or
>>> "Reply-all"
>>> functionality.
>
> I'm curious what your MUA is doing when you click reply and reply all
> on this list.

For your and mine curiosity I'll pressed reply this time. (The two times
before I used reply all.)

> Does the broken threading happen on other mailing lists
> or just this one?

Haven't tested any other mailing lists using tormail.net.

> This mailing list violates RFC 2822 and munges reply-to headers. I
> wonder if this has anything to do with what you have been seeing.

No idea.

_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk