Thus spake Nathan Freitas (nathan@xxxxxxxxxxx): > No problem and glad to see overlap. I just wanted a publicly stated > opinion as I have zero experience with it, and reputation and trust > are all that matter! I also work with Georg Koppen of JonDos on Tor Browser. He's given a lot of feedback to the design document, has pointed out bugs, and has helped with a couple fixes to issues we both shared (he works on the JonDos browser). I think Tor Browser is quite a bit better off thanks to his input and assistance. JonDos has something of a bad reputation in the Tor community because of the "backdoor" Karsten and Robert mentioned. I think that against adversaries like organized crime and oppressive governments, this property can be a dangerous one for both users and node operators. However, while I would not feel as comfortable operating nodes of such a service as compared to relatively risk-free Tor bridge, entry and middle nodes, the "three hop collusion" requirement is the extent of that backdoor, as far as I am aware. They otherwise take their privacy work very seriously. -- Mike Perry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk