Thus spake Okhin (okhin@xxxxxxxx): > I'm currently trying to find a way to easily spread some > pre-configured, pre-installed devices embedding a tor-relay. And I > have some TP Link hardware, the smallest of them being the WR703N > (http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/tp-link/tl-wr703n). Those devices are > cheap and handy (can actually run on battery for years,since it does > not consumes that much power... around 1W/h). I hope this reply isn't too discouraging, but I'm somewhat of a pessimist/hater when it comes to "Let's put a Tor relay on that tiny computer!" projects. Sure, I guess everybody loves the endorphin rush from bragging that their phone/wristwatch/fridge is a Tor relay, but with the current limits on Tor network size, it's unlikely that the network could support enough of these tiny relays to actually make any substantial capacity difference, and they may actually harm overall performance rather than help it. As it stands, directory overhead will probably become unmanageable if we get much more than 10k tor relays in total right now, and perhaps more importantly queuing theory and experimental results indicate that adding more slow relays will actually hurt performance more than help[1,2]. I think a super-portable device that can either do transparent Tor proxying and/or run a hidden service for you are probably both better use cases for tiny hardware than a full fledged relay, especially if your goal is to actually have these things see real use. [1]. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~sjm217/papers/pets08metrics.pdf, section 6. [2]. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1854 -- Mike Perry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk