[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Integrity of platforms: Trusted Computing

To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Integrity of platforms: Trusted Computing
From: Blibbet <blibbet@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:01:27 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:12:30 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MIgQJ+1BbhKypyrtuhugsa5pUV4huksfTezr6xYrryI=; b=u/lzl5IAF4Xoqq8FKFC6VYa1+KRiUxg2N1yLo4YnqL02oXsDqA/OV9lPEc61O2cUL/ 8+d0tb8MfGCSNlr/Gs4ST0IltvKhxDVhpNEJ60kHymUtv+DQhTiIX2qdxf3YgEXpAoyW HjETrsfcjTcSeNRTidl2sloX3WAAmdQcwEs9oH3pYnOdWEwU10DIWEdbURfyzUzqIe0P QWy/joZ6XGLwwjgX0jQES+lJyKqFwGrgMSbA1gyoOCNwJhPjWBEqzBK0NEb0ljSGmt+a 4biDyLrarZ2SataLNVLBm4BifV0zOdpr/LwxttyFCWfOub25OPiwz9Rk9hyxFumz19+m 6l0g==
In-reply-to: <52DFFF3D.9090805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <52DFAE3F.1070107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52DFFF3D.9090805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121005 Thunderbird/16.0

>> I'm wondering if, within anonymity community, the trusted computing
>> technologies hasn't been evaluated properly for the values that it could
>> be provide in terms of operating system and application integrity.
>
> +1
>
> Pond uses the TPM.

StrongSwan and FreeRadius use TCG's TNC.

Both TPM and TNC might be interesting for Tor.

But AFAIK there are no portable TPM/TNC libraries, and OS support forthem varies, Linux has Linux-IMA. I haven't used PacketFence or TNC-FHHor OpenStack's OpenAttestation yet. I think Windows has APIs, butWin8-onward only. I don't know of any MacOSX options. And TCG is onlyuseful on Intel/AMD hardware, for ARM, you'll need TrustZone and/orGlobalPlatform TEE.

--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

References:
- [tor-talk] Integrity of platforms: Trusted Computing
  - From: Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
- Re: [tor-talk] Integrity of platforms: Trusted Computing
  - From: Moritz Bartl

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-talk] Shutting down the relay-search service by the end of the year
Next by Author: [tor-talk] jondonym over tor, tor over jondo?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-talk] Integrity of platforms: Trusted Computing
Next by thread: [tor-talk] Tor Weekly News â January 22nd, 2014
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread