[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: General question about exit policies...

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: General question about exit policies...
From: punkle jones <punkle.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:51:54 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:51:57 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=S1j7mt/MbztXx5B4g/t5xjj49LqyxDaALuOxe4aa3o8=; b=B4tei3HL0lRSGSK8oCzuht7LAa7Ze5EuuGc39nmYsZpVUnIrU2nty1asVnwTaENJTi ZaozweZldMmRHvo50xWphmxcbYmwuIwbt8POQ0+S1oGuawz/j76AnFSTTDiioKpDs/Qf rxOVl09h74lBn6zjEpr7+bNG+jbo1ejXONpSo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=oDsFnyKNQnf3j3ZvD3U2LKfvShlNNsuHo5oJ2St56njysbhFQovh06W7PE18f6wKa/ kmJn46eUQreYSwaKitRIlz044bAKxvtgu3dg0Ckzvp/SfiacI3UCqEZy5nddq4at8V7L frWc3PDN3VZv2ol8SuopAPxMldfvBQ0vG/gEY=
In-reply-to: <750843.29510.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <21f144250906301809p38ed0b79va86261ba14de9d2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A4ABA37.90401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <21f144250906301830v5a638d44pf6ea1190eaa51f4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A4ABDC8.2080003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A4AC030.2050908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <21f144250906301855k230ef54dq68a0dd055af7aa96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A4AC7EA.6000309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A4B9A4F.2060306@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <750843.29510.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Curious Kid <letsshareinformation@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

----- Original Message ----
> From: Bill McGonigle <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2009 7:18:07 PM
> Subject: Re: General question about exit policies...
>
> On 06/30/2009 10:20 PM, Michael wrote:
> > accept *.google.com:80
>
> thinking aloud...
>
> What if:
>
> o Google was supportive of "good" uses of Tor, for its services

That appears impossible. Google needs to filter content based on where you live, analyze web trends, and serve you contextual advertising based what you do and see.

Google could absolutely do this in a reduced-bandwidth fashion: allow tor freely, track anonymity trending, develop non-free tools based on said trends at google labs, sell them back to you, and profit. Google Semi-AnonyDesktop. Yuck.

--
Punkle Jones // cDc/NSF NON-31337 humanoid

References:
- Re: General question about exit policies...
  - From: Bill McGonigle
- Re: General question about exit policies...
  - From: Curious Kid

Prev by Author: Re: VoIP telephony building like Tor
Next by Author: Question: Hidden Services, Virtual Machines, and iptables
Previous by thread: Re: General question about exit policies...
Next by thread: Re: Obfuscated URLs?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread