Sambuddho Chakravarty wrote:
I can send you folks the debug and notice dump files which have recorded the debug and notice information while a connection attempt failed. Should I paste them here (they are pretty huge).Scott Bennett wrote:On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:28:02 -0700 Kyle Williams <kyle.kwilliams@xxxxxxxxx>Pardon me my lack of knowledge of English language , but do you mean that 4 out of 10 chances you are able to connect to your hidden service and earlier you had higher success rate (7 out of 10 ) ?wrote:On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Sambuddho Chakravarty <sc2516@xxxxxxxxxxxxwrote: Sambuddho Chakravarty wrote:Andrew Lewman wrote:On 07/13/2009 01:31 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:I should also add that your hidden service lighttpd default page worksOn 07/13/2009 01:24 PM, Sambuddho Chakravarty wrote:Is it possibly due to some firewall rules. But I have made sure thatSo long as your tor client can connect to the tor network, there is nothehost that runs the server is not filtering any packets... Still notsure why I get this . Infact you can try it out yourselfneed to mess with firewalls, ports, or anything.fine.Hello AndrewThanks a lot. Seems to be working right now for me... but I the behaviouris at times erratic... -Sambuddho Hello AndrewNow it has suddenly again stopped.This is the nature of a over saturated network.This claim keeps appearing on this list, yet I see my node usually using in the range of 10% - 40% of the limits I set on it to stay within Comcast's monthly cap. Back before I ran into Comcast's secret policedivision and had to set limits, it spent most of its time in the 35% - 70%range.Thanks Sambuddho
Thanks Sambuddho
Hidden services seem spotty to me too, but their's not much I can do aboutit except try again and be patient.Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * **********************************************************************