[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Liability to Prosecution for Operating Tor Nodes in Austria




On 7/1/2014 6:35 PM, flapflap wrote:
Hi,

FYI (both only in German):
https://network23.org/blackoutaustria/2014/07/01/to-whom-it-my-concern/
(via https://blog.fefe.de/?ts=ad4dd623)

(I'm not familiar with the language of law, just try to summarize it to
inform you; maybe someone else could translate it more accurately...)

A court in Austria ruled that one can be held liable to prosecution for
operating a Tor Exit [but likely also Middle] Node, when it is used by
someone to commit a criminal action.

The judge justifies the decision by §12 of the penal code:
"Not only the direct perpetrator commits a criminal action, but also
everyone who appoints someone else to commit it or otherwise adds to its
execution."

what a sad and poor decision :(

To cite (and roughly translate) Fefe:
"As a precaution, Austrians should stop operating communication
infrastructure like Jabber, email, and web servers with comment or
upload functionality, or telephones and fax machines. If I [Fefe] were
the post, I [Fefe] would stop operations, too."

~flapflap

Wouldn't that mean that any mainstream ISP would also be liable for one of their customers committing a crime while using their service?
Or GM is liable if a driver of a GM car gets drunk & injures someone?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk