Re: [tor-talk] OnionBalance Hidden Service has over 1 million successful hits in just 3 days

[Thomas White <thomaswhite@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I wonder if the curl 000 codes match up against our 408 codes for a
timeout? So the connection was made, the request was about to be made
then the circuit failed? I'm not overly familiar with the precise
nature of curl or apache logging systems.

On 08/07/2015 15:39, Ben wrote:
>> From the client end, I've seen occasions where I couldn't connect
>> to the
> HS, though it's a very small percentage (around 1.5%).
> 
> Count Status code 590 000 408391 200
> 
> 000 being the code curl returns when it couldn't connect. In terms
> of time to serve, there's a fair range of variation in terms of the
> total connection time.
> 
> Count  Seconds 45207 0 149979 1 103050 2 55134 3 27011 4 13688 5 
> 7405 6 4022 7 2217 8 1324 9
> 
> All connections were established in less than a second, and the
> time to first byte was generally < 2 seconds
> 
> Count TTFB 590 0 408479 1 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 5 8 10 9
> 
> 
> Obviously some of the variation might be down to my client's
> connection rather than the hidden service, it's running on a stable
> 100Mb/s connection, though the traffic graphs show some fluctuation
> in the bandwidth being used (attached - stats taken at the NIC so
> likely includes other traffic though the test will be the primary
> use).
> 
> Happy to send the stats file in full if it's of any use to you.
> 
> 
> Thomas White <thomaswhite@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Just to expand on s7r's number, I just pulled the latest logs
>> from the servers and compiled a quick breakdown of the HTTP
>> codes, bandwidth etc for anyone interested:
>> 
>> HTTP Code: 200 (OK) Bandwidth used (bytes): 690,400,220,422 Hits:
>> 4,784,288
>> 
>> 
>> HTTP Code: 206 (Partial Content) Bandwidth used (bytes):
>> 5,202,918 Hits: 64
>> 
>> 
>> HTTP Code: 304 (Not Modified) Bandwidth used (bytes): 52,059 
>> Hits: 259
>> 
>> 
>> HTTP Code: 404 (Not Found) Bandwidth used (bytes): 266,053 Hits:
>> 611
>> 
>> 
>> HTTP Code: 403 (Forbidden) Bandwidth used (bytes): 2,908 Hits: 7
>> 
>> 
>> HTTP Code: 408 (Request Timeout) Bandwidth used (bytes): 0 Hits:
>> 5,442
>> 
>> 
>> Total bandwidth usage (bytes): 690,405,744,360 (690 GB)
>> 
>> Total hits: 4,790,671
>> 
>> 
>> Not bad for a few days work guys!
>> 
>> T
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 08/07/2015 03:00, s7r wrote:
>>> *Numbers look good: Over 4 million hits in 7 days.*
>>> 
>>> I want again to use this opportunity to say THANK YOU to
>>> everyone who is contributing and stress testing. 4 million
>>> requests tell me people are putting quite some effort into it.
>>> Please continue to stress test as much as you can in the next
>>> days. After I collect some rendezvous circuit stats also, we
>>> will stop the test - don't want to overkill the network, prefer
>>> to leave more bandwidth capacity for users.
>>> 
>>> I was waiting to have some rendezvous circuit statistics as
>>> well, to compare them with the hits on the webserver and have
>>> an overview on the circuits stats and average number of
>>> requests per circuit. Hopefully this will happen in the next
>>> days. Since you asked, here are the exact numbers now.
>>> 
>>> The service was started 1st July 2015. Here are the counts
>>> today, 8th July (little over 7 days of uptime):
>>> 
>>> Failback instance #1: 956281 Failback instance #2: 732187
>>> Failback instance #3: 837818 Failback instance #4: 768636
>>> Failback instance #5: 911546 =============================
>>> TOTAL: 4206468
>>> 
>>> There are no significant warnings or errors - the same
>>> instances are running since service first started, no reboot or
>>> application restart. I am happy with how it works. As you can
>>> see we have *over 4 million hits*. The number of requests per
>>> failback instance confirms the load is fairly spread.
>>> 
>>> Hidden service http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion/ up and strong!
>>> 
>>> On 7/8/2015 1:48 AM, tqr2813d376cjozqap1l@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> 4. Jul 2015 22:57 by s7r@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:s7r@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> 
>>>> After little over 3 days of uptime, the OnionBalance hidden 
>>>> service http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion 
>>>> <http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion/> was successfully accessed
>>>> over 1 Million times. There was no complaint in any of the
>>>> running Tor instance s.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Hey s7r, things still looking OK? How are the numbers now?
>>> 
>>> 
>> -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To
>> unsubscribe or change other settings go to 
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=h2uJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk